In Colombia, biofuel production is a mandate—a 2007 law
called for a minimum blend of 10% ethanol (E10) and 5% biodiesel (B5), and the
Transmilenio mass transit system in Bogotá has been running on mixtures of
between B5 and B50 since then. Biofuels
burn clean and are often seen as part of the solution to overreliance on fossil
fuels and climate-warming greenhouse gas emissions. The Colombian government is
also promoting palm plantations as a way to eradicate coca production while
providing poor farmers with a lucrative alternative.
However, biofuels have a dark side. Though low-carbon on the
tailpipe end, biofuels can actually be a large source of carbon emissions on
the production end, if forests are cut down to make way for monoculture palm
plantations. In Colombia, these palm plantations have not only displaced
carbon, but also people—mostly Afro-Colombian and indigenous people. And with
the government aiming to expand the land area used for export crops, including
palm oil, to seven million hectares by 2020, these deforestation and land
rights issues will only become more acute if not addressed soon.
How can biofuel policy in Colombia promote economic
development and climate change mitigation without compromising the environment
or human rights? The IEDP environment team has been trying to untangle this
issue for the last two months, and on Friday, we’ll present some preliminary
ideas to the class. Mike Dwyer, Director of Global Policy Analysis at the
Foreign Agricultural Service of USDA, along with biofuel experts Renee Schwartz
and Paul Trupo, will join us for an overview of U.S. interests in Colombian
biofuel production.
No comments:
Post a Comment